I see via Dylan’s blog that there’s an Episcopal priest in Washington who is claiming to be both Christian and Muslim, and who is continuing to practice as a priest even after her conversion to Islam. Unsurprisingly, this seems to have caused some controversy. Mostly, I agree with what Dylan has said, and AKMA before her.
Having spent a number of years in graduate school in History of Religion, I think I can say with some authority that there are real differences in religious traditions and religious communities, that they are not all the same, and that in general, one should be careful of anyone trying to convince you that they are. I will grant the possibility that all religions are paths up the same mountain or some such, but frankly, there’s not a whole lot of supporting evidence for that, and mostly I find that position to be a slightly passive agressive way for people to say “I can only accept you if underneath it all, everything you do and believe is really the same as what I do and believe.” That’s not real dialog, and that’s not real acceptance. If we can’t live with being different, we’re doomed.
The other thing that I am somewhat bothered by is the way this seems to reflects certain attitude, perhaps not unique to American protestantism, that suggests that somehow religious faith is a purely individual matter, and that you can believe whatever you want and call yourself whatever you want without reference to a larger community. (An idea that Slacktivist had some fun with a while back.) It’s not true. You can call yourself Jewish, or Christian, or Muslim, and then decide it means whatever you think it means, independent of the communities that those names, but that’s a sort of Humpty Dumpty approach to religion:
`I don’t know what you mean by “glory,”‘ Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. `Of course you don’t — till I tell you. I meant “there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!”‘
`But “glory” doesn’t mean “a nice knock-down argument,”‘ Alice objected.
`When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, `it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
`The question is,’ said Alice, `whether you CAN make words mean so many different things.’
`The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, `which is to be master – - that’s all.’
It may well be possible for an individual in their personal spiritual life to have a strong identification with both Christianity and Islam, and make an individual reconciling of the beliefs and practices of each, but many members of both of those religious communities will not recognize this reconciling. Of course, many Christians do not recognize other Christians as Christian, so perhaps this is for many a non-issue. But people are religious in community. Indeed, I’m not sure it’s possible to be a Christian without a community. But that’s another post, and that’s not the real point of this post.
The real point of this post is to say that this story immediately reminded me of this classic article from the Onion:
Christ Converts to Islam
which in turn, reminded me of this even more classic:
Christ Returns to NBA
And if Christ can return to the NBA, then I can return to blogging.